Cloud gaming is going to have a game soundtrack licensing problem
Game soundtracks include licensed music. Licensed music has streaming rights that differ from the games themselves. Cloud gaming's streaming model is about to collide with music licensing in ways the industry hasn't planned for.
What games do with licensed music
GTA V's radio stations: hundreds of licensed tracks across genres. The licensing is per-territory and per-distribution-format. When GTA V was added to PS Plus Premium cloud streaming, several tracks dropped from the cloud version because the publisher's cloud-streaming license didn't cover them.
Forza Horizon series: licensed soundtracks rotate with new entries. Some Horizon tracks have dropped from cloud-streamed versions when their licenses expired.
EA Sports titles (FIFA/FC, Madden, NHL): heavily licensed soundtracks updated annually. Cloud licensing is more complex than for purchased local copies because the license usage pattern is different.
Tony Hawk's series remaster: famously had licensing issues that affected the music availability. The cloud version had different music than the disk version in some markets.
Why cloud streaming licensing is harder
A game sold as a local copy uses music in a specific way: the user plays the game and hears the music. The licensing model assumes this.
A game streamed via cloud gaming uses music in a different way: the music is decoded on the cloud server and transmitted as part of the video stream to the user. Functionally identical from the user's perspective, but the licensing-rights framework treats them as different acts.
Music licensors have started to require separate licensing for cloud streaming use. The fees and terms are different. Publishers either pay the extra licensing or drop tracks from cloud versions.
What's already happening quietly
GTA V on PS Plus Premium cloud streaming has approximately 8% fewer licensed tracks than the disk version, based on community-tracked comparisons. Rockstar hasn't publicly acknowledged the difference.
Forza Horizon 5 on Game Pass Cloud has had several tracks removed and added over the cloud streaming lifecycle that don't correlate with the disk version's updates. Microsoft handles this opaquely.
Several smaller titles with licensed music have either pulled cloud availability entirely or shipped cloud versions with placeholder/different music.
Why this is going to get worse
Cloud subscriber bases are growing. The music licensing fees scale with cloud usage. As cloud usage of music-heavy titles grows, the publisher cost grows, and the publishers either eat the cost or drop tracks.
Music industry consolidation continues. Universal, Sony, Warner control most of the licensed music in major game soundtracks. They have leverage to renegotiate cloud licensing terms upward.
Streaming music's per-stream economics inform the music industry's expectations for cloud gaming music. The expectation that 'a stream is a stream' brings cloud gaming into a higher-cost-per-use model than disk distribution.
Why this isn't being discussed
Music licensing is opaque even to most game journalists. The contracts are confidential, the licensing is per-territory, and the effects on cloud are inconsistent across titles.
Publishers don't want to highlight that the cloud version is different from the disk version. Drawing attention to the licensing-driven track removal would hurt the cloud pitch.
Music labels don't want to be seen as making cloud gaming worse. The PR optics are bad.
What I think is going to happen
By 2027, the cloud-streamed versions of music-heavy titles will routinely differ from the disk versions. The difference will be 10-20% of licensed tracks on average. Some titles will drop cloud availability entirely.
Publishers may experiment with 'cloud-original' soundtracks where the music is licensed specifically for cloud use, at lower cost. Some indie titles are already doing this (royalty-free or original music to avoid licensing complexity).
Eventually a major lawsuit between a music label and a cloud gaming service will set the licensing model. Until that happens, the current ad-hoc approach persists.
What this means for players
If music is a meaningful part of why you play a specific title (GTA V's radio, Forza Horizon's soundtrack, sports games' anthems), the cloud version may not be the version the marketing implies. Check community-maintained track lists for cloud-specific differences.
For most titles the difference is small or zero. Don't preemptively worry about this for every cloud title. But know that the cloud version isn't always identical to the disk version, and the differences are most often music-related when they happen.
More from the blog
- Opinion · 6 min readRoguelikes are the cloud-friendliest genre and nobody markets it
- Opinion · 6 min readVoice chat is the silent failure of cloud multiplayer
- Opinion · 6 min readCloud gaming customer support is meaningfully worse than streaming video customer support
- Opinion · 6 min readAudio quality is the dimension cloud gaming reviews ignore